Posted: June 21, 2011 at 12:03 pm
Rumors of Poll Flying
About a week ago Public Policy Polling put out a call for folks to vote on the next two states that they’d like to see polled. The choices were Florida, Montana, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Montana was one of the winners.
I can see why folks wanted to see polling from Montana, we have what is already being talked about as the most competitive governor’s race in the nation in 2012, and the Tester v. Rehberg contest is one of the top three races for U.S. Senate. We also have a race for an open Congressional seat that could get interesting.
It will be interesting to see what races will be polled. Montanans haven’t had any information yet on Rick Hill vs. Ken Miller in the GOP primary, or for that matter Neil Livingstone or on Bullock vs. Bohlinger on the Dem side. D.C. folks have been chattering about a 2014 primary between Baucus and Schweitzer, and a couple of candidates have jumped into the House race with Rep. Franke Wilmer including Dave Strohmaier, of Missoula, and Senator Kim Gillan, of Billings.
Stay tuned to Public Policy Polling, as the poll may come out any day now. Anybody hear anything? If you get a call, email me on the tip line or leave a comment about which races are being polled.

Did you miss their tweet? Here it is…
http://bit.ly/ifowds
So we know they are doing the U.S. Senate race, which I guess is no surprise. I wish they would do some Tier B races like AG, but none of the new candidates probably have the name recognition to make poll results worthwhile.
My two cents: They aren’t going to poll all 800 candidates for governor on the Republican side. They are going to pick two or three that are the most likely to win. Probably one on the TEA Party side and one on the establishment side. I’d say Miller and Hill are about right. Also, I don’t think the House race gets polled, but we’ll see, it just seems like the candidates are too new. My guess is they’ll do some generic dem vs. generic repubs.
If they asked me, Id tell them they should poll legislative races. It would be interesting to see if the low opinion people had of the legislature during the session is continuing to bother voters.
I know someone who got a phone call from a Public Policy group. Probably the same group. Based on what she told me, here are the races they tested, and here are my predictions.
Dem Primary
schweitzer 12 pt lead
baucus
Gov general
bullock 4 pt lead
hill
GOP Primary
bohlinger 15
hill 25
stapleton 8
miller 8
livingstone 8
Denny 4 pt lead
Tester
Flint doesn’t understand how to read a poll. He can read, but he doesn’t understand what the significance of the data is. Note that you don’t see Rehberg’s campaign touting these numbers. Here’s why.
Independent Voters
Rehberg Approve 35
Rehberg Disapprove 54
Independent Voters
Tester Approve 53
Tester Disapprove 36
That my friends, is shocking.
Flint reads the numbers that say Tester trails by 4, but not that Republicans outnumbered dems by 9.
Darwin: I hadn’t even read into the poll yet. PPP themselves said “Tester is in trouble.”
Yeah, read all of it Aaron.
They polled 8% more women than men.
They don’t say “Tester is in trouble.” And you know it. Lay off the kool-aid buddy and try to think for yourself for once. You aren’t a moron.
Darwin. Look at the message sent from PPP on twitter. I linked to it here: see the screenshot and the link.
http://www.northernbroadcasting.com/Talk/FlintReportHeadlines/tabid/519/ID/4002/Liberal-Pollster-Tester-in-Trouble.aspx
I guess PPP was drinking the Kool Aid huh?
Next shovel ready job- SHOVEL NEEDED: to remove giant foot from Darwin’s mouth.
Here’s the link to the first days roll out. Can’t wait to see what comes out next with this poll, which will be released over the next few days: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MT_0621.pdf
They will try to spin numbers any way they can
http://www.alternet.org/story/151378/the_inner_secrets_of_the_right_wing_echo_chamber?page=entire