Here’s Steve Daines During his Tele-Town Hall with a Bunch of Snapchat Filters

Senator Steve Daines continues to refuse to hold an in-person town hall.

He prefers to hold tele-town halls.  Ones where he can screen the questions, cut off follow-ups, and likely have his staff do a funny voice in order to sound like “Rick from Libby” who happens to hate LIBERALS.

The fact that Daines will not hold an in-person town hall makes me think there is something fishy going on with these tele-town halls.

So because I view these as a farce, I must treat them so.  I promise this will be more worth your time than Daines’ 45 minute tele-town hall

Steve Daines is a big fan of snapchat, so I present, Steve Daines in many snapchat filters.

Share

11 Comments on "Here’s Steve Daines During his Tele-Town Hall with a Bunch of Snapchat Filters"

  1. And of course, he always calls at dinner time when most Montanans are on a lengthy commute, trying to juggle work/school schedules with athletic practice, getting dinner ready for hungry children, helping feed the stock, just to name a few of those pesky incidentals we all face living in the last best place. We are not all rich and have the ability to hire somebody to do everything for us.
    Hey asshole, schedule a real meeting and actually come face to face with the people that elected you. Yeah, that is a tough thing to ask but on the other hand, that is what most Montanans do-face reality and deal with adversity in person.
    Daines, you are a coward.

  2. I hung up on him again – his obnoxious robo call. You’d think by now he would do us both a favor and remove me from his list.

  3. I think I’ll hang up from now on. Half an hour of him reading off the names of the fires ( as if we don’t know them) and tooting his own horn ruins my whole night!

  4. Some years ago, during his original campaign, Daines did a townhall in Sidney. I drove over a hundred miles to be there. It was in the hands of some conservative organization like Farm Bureau. The event was totally controlled: seating, questions, applause.
    What was the threat? The whole state is Republican, the entire legislature is Republican, ag is the economy and agriculturists all vote Republican. The atmosphere can’t be more friendly, yet it seemed as if a SWAT team was charging down.
    Many audience members found it a real learning experience.

  5. Are you people 10 years old? Not even funny. I’m not a fan of Daines, but really!

  6. Montana Public Radio News Director Eric Whitney sat in the studio and listened to Senator Daines’ phone call with University of Montana Forest Ecologist Dr. Andrew Larson.

    You can listen to the interview here (http://mtpr.org/post/forest-ecologist-comments-senator-daines-fire-call) and the transcript is below. Suffice to say, Dr. Larson took Senator Steve Daines to the woodshed and dumped cold water on his incendiary and childish “radical environmentalist” rhetoric.

    It’s also worth pointing out that for at least the past twenty years us ‘radical’ ‘fringe’ and ‘extremist’ environmentalists have been basically delivering the same message and points that Dr. Larson does in this excellent, in-depth Montana Public Radio interview. Maybe politicians and other folks will start listening?

    ————-

    Last night Senator Steve Daines held what he calls a “tele-townhall,” one of the periodic conference calls he invites Montanans to join, in which he takes a few questions from callers. This one was also live streamed on his Facebook page. The topic was forest management and wildfires.

    Senator Daines said Montanans are angry about the fires and smoke they’ve been enduring this summer, and placed the blame for the fires on, “Radical environmentalists, who are blocking projects to remove dead trees, even in some cases, trees, lodgepoles, that died from insect infestation,” Daines said. “We have radical environmental groups that do not represent the vast majority of Montanans, who believe in a balanced, common sense approach. They stop these projects.”

    As he’s done before, Daines offered the Stonewall project outside Lincoln as an example of a logging project proposed by the U.S. Forest Service that could have reduced fire danger, had it not been stopped by a lawsuit. The Alliance for the Wild Rockies sued to stop the Stonewall, which was proposed for an area now being partially consumed by the 18,000-acre Park Creek Fire.

    “The environmentalists are not responsible for that fire burning, and had the Stonewall project advanced, it’s very likely that the site would be burning today,” says Andrew Larson. He’s not an environmental activist. He’s an associate professor of forest ecology in the forestry college at the University of Montana.

    “As an ecologist, as someone — I’m trained as a forester — I would expect and hope that that forest, that hypothetical treated forest, would burn. Because that’s what it needs to function, to be a healthy forest ecosystem. Montana forests are only going to function when they have fire in them. That’s a healthy forest,” Larson said.

    I listened to Senator Daines’ conference call with Larson, who said he detected a change in the senator’s comments about wildfires. Daines has been saying that more logging would prevent forest fires. Last night he said more logging and forest management won’t entirely eliminate fire from the landscape, but will reduce risks from and severity of wildfires.

    “I really was pleased to hear him say that. That’s, I think, a really important incorporation of some forest ecology, fire ecology knowledge into the types of things he’s saying,” Larson said.

    “However, the entire conversation tonight on the tele-townhall mingled them, sometimes explicitly. More often there was the implication that, if we do more logging, more vegetation management, more thinning, we won’t have as many acres burned, and we won’t be breathing as much smoke; and that’s just absolutely not true,” Larson said.

    “What we might be able to achieve with a more active vegetation management program are areas that don’t burn with as high a severity, we also might have safer working environments for fire managers.”

    Larson acknowledged that it may seem counterintuitive that not removing vegetation from forests will have no impact the number of acres that burn in a given year, or the amount of smoke, but, “The total biomass that’s consumed might be less, but the only time you do not have enough fuel to carry a fire is going to be in the first year or two after a fire has burned,” he said.

    “Even after you go and thin a forest, when it’s dry like it is now, it’s still going to carry a fire, it’s still going to generate smoke. So, in terms of day to day life, the experience we have during the fire season, we need to not get our hopes up,” Larson says. “You can anticipate more smoke. Even if we were to double, triple, increase the amount of area logged or thinned by a factor of ten or 20, we’re still going have smoke, we’re not going to stop the fires. We may change how they burn, and that’s an important outcome, it’s something that a lot of my research is directed at. But we need to make sure people don’t get their hopes up and expect something that the forestry profession, that managers in the Forest Service, the Department of Interior, can’t deliver on.”

    A woman identified as Patricia from Ft. Benton, was one of the eight callers who were able to speak to Senator Daines last night. She asked about trees killed by pine beetles.

    “And I was troubled, because I couldn’t understand why those trees were remaining, because they are a fire hazard, they are dead trees, so there is no reason for them to remain.”

    Daines agreed, and said only, “radical environmentalists” would try to stop efforts to remove dead trees from Montana forests.

    “That’s an attitude that I’m always kind of disappointed to encounter,” Larson said, “because a healthy forest has dead trees and dead wood. The snags — standing dead trees — and dead logs are some of the most important habitat features for biodiversity. You can’t have an intact, healthy wildlife community without dead wood in your forest.”

    One of the lines Senator Daines often uses when talking about public lands management is, “a managed forest is a healthy forest.”

    “One of the problems is, ‘healthy’ doesn’t have a scientific definition,” Larson said, “so, when we come at it from a technical perspective, it can mean whatever we want it to mean. Some of the most intensively managed forests in the world are in Northern Europe, and they are in a biodiversity crisis, because they have mismanaged their dead wood. They never let their trees get old, they never let ’em die. They cut ’em down and take them to the mill, and there is a horrible deficit of dead wood in those forests. And as a consequence, they’re compromised, they’re not functioning, they’re not providing the habitat for all the native biodiversity, the native wildlife species.

    I asked Professor Larson what he thinks is important for Montanans who listened to Senator Daines’ conference call to keep in mind.

    “My main points are, climate and weather drive fire. Healthy forests have to have dead trees in them. That’s not saying that we can’t cut some of the dead trees down. But you can’t have a functional forest without dead trees, they’re incredibly important for habitat,” Larson said.

    “And the forestry profession, we need to be careful to not promise things that we can’t deliver,” he said. “And we’re never going to stop fire. We can help society live with fire, but that’s going to be a big team effort. We have to change our expectations. We need to expect that fire to come at some point, and not be surprised. We need to be planning for it — individual land owners, home owners — because that’s the environment we live in.”

    • Not a radical. Informed, measured, reasonable. Not trying to inflame the irritated. Not trying to squash the establishment. Just facts, research, experience, science. This is why we need to support our state’s University system and help it be the best it can be.

  7. Daines dosn’t believe in climate change so his only answer to forest fires is cut down all the trees. Unfortunately if he had payed attention in science class, he would know that shade from forests help the land from becoming a giant heat sink.

  8. After listening to Senator Daines, one wonders how well he did in school or is he just being a typical politician playing to the fears and ignorance of a select segment of the population.

  9. boB AKA @Gyrogyrloose | September 14, 2017 1:34 PM at 1:34 PM | Reply

    as an old-well, middle aged if I live to 125, man who has watched Montana forests dry up over the past thirty years, the glaciers disappear from Glacier Park, winters become more umpredictable, a CHANGING CLIMATE seems kind of obvious. At this point whether humans caused it or not we have to make some changes to deal with it. The fires burning in BC are a refutation to the “environmental extremist” argument-they cut down every thing in sight over vast areas and have more fires than we do. Incidentally, this is also why Montana forest industry workers are idle-Canadian timber dumping has driven prices so low we can’t compete. NAFTA, CAFTA, TPP, these are why jobs are gone-Reaganomics. WE so desperately need another Will Rogers but when I say this to youngsters they ask me “the MASH guy?”sigh…

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*