Tagged: corporations

Posted: June 14, 2012 at 7:53 am

Moving Montana Backward

kids should focus on learning - not checking their pagers all dayRick Hill’s understanding of economic policy and education funding appears to be outdated.

This week, Hill, who has been out of public policy discussions for most of the last decade, dusted off his vision for education funding–well, he dusted off Wyoming’s vision anyway.

Actually, given the tax give-aways for corporations Hill is also proposing, Hill’s plan looks more like a failed Wyoming proposal from Hill’s era 20 years ago–cutting taxes for big corporations like Exxon Mobil.  Hill has been out of it for a while, so perhaps he can be excused for not having the most current information. By the time Hill rolls out his next education idea–say banning pagers in schools–we’ll be used to it.

Montana’s tax on oil production used to be similar to Wyoming’s until Montana’s Oil Tax Holiday went into effect in the 1990s. A “tax holiday” means that that the first years production of a new well would go untaxed by the state.

Years back, Wyoming implemented a similar tax holiday on a two year trial basis. But after only one year the legislature realized the idea was a giant failure and rescinded the tax holiday immediately. They found it didn’t create more production or more employment, but it did decrease state revenues alarmingly-including funding for education.

Hill used to blather about how we needed to be more like North Dakota, rather than Wyoming. So I guess Wyoming is the New North Dakota for the former 1990s Congressman.

GOP candidates used to repeat ad nauseum that North Dakota had fewer taxes and relations and therefore more development.   Then Governor Brian Schweitzer called them out on their lies. Schweitzer said  ”that Republican candidates for governor, who he referred to as ‘jokers,’ are wrong to blame taxes and regulations,” for differing oil development levels in Montana and North Dakota the AP reports.

There are more oil wells North Dakota because there is more oil there to drill.  According to Montana Department of Commerce Energy Production and Development Division statistics, Montana’s taxes related to oil and gas production are 40-50% lower than in North Dakota. Our state also has a faster permitting process than both North Dakota and Wyoming.  Montana permits are out in 60 days on average.  In Wyoming a permit takes ten months.  It takes a year in  North Dakota.

It’s just not a good sign that Rick Hill–rather than coming up with current ideas to fit Montana in the 21st century–is focusing on obscuring the facts to make Montanans think we want to be more like Wyoming or North Dakota instead.

 

Posted: May 4, 2012 at 9:07 pm

Schweitzer Talks Montana’s Fight Against Citizens United on Hardball

Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer was on Hardball tonight to talk about his support for a ballot initiative to ban corporate money in politics.  Here’s the video:

Montana is also leading the challenge to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.  Montana AG Steve Bullock argued successfully against corruption in the Montana Supreme Court, which upheld the state’s century-old ban on corporations’ spending. The case is now before the Supreme Court for a possible summary judgment.

Corporations are not people.  Find out more about the Stand with Montanans campaign online here

Posted: April 9, 2012 at 9:46 pm

The TEA Party Doesn’t Represent Helena

Montanans have a strong candidate in the race to take back the seat held by TEA Party nutjob Liz Bangerter.    

Long-time Helena leader Kelsen Young (pictured) says she’s running for office because she believes “we need more strong, independent and progressive voices at the State Legislature.”  So true.

Bangerter is a Republican first-term legislator campaigning for re-election to Helena’s House District 80.  She was elected to represent a liberal district by pretending to be a moderate. Then, she turned out to be one of the most conservative GOPers out there.   Bangerter voted for Derek Skees’ unconstitutional scheme to create an eleven person panel to nullify federal laws and voted to allow hunting with silencers.   Worse, she actually sponsored the bill to legalize insurance company discrimination against women.

It turns out that Bangerter actually serves on ALEC’s Health and Human Services Task Force.  For those of you not familiar with ALEC, here’s the deal.  Through ALEC, behind closed doors, corporations hand state legislators like Bangerter exact changes to the law they want passed.

What kind of bills?  Often these are changes to the laws that will make the corporations more money.  They are also often bills that the GOP will introduce only to attack Democrats in the next election, based on their votes.  The pre-drafted ALEC bills are all wrapped up with neat little talking points and press releases so the legislator doesn’t actually need any brain cells.

Besides legislators like Bangerter, only corporations have full membership standing in ALEC. Corporations sit on all ALEC task forces–like the one Bangerter is on.  The corporations vote with legislators to approve “model” bills–the only difference is that the corporations get veto power over any legislator ideas.

And so, Bangerter is one of the last people we need making Montana laws.  Thankfully, with a top quality candidate like Kelsen in the race, it looks like Bangerter’s is one more seat that the Republicans won’t be keeping.

To find out more about Kelsen, visit her website.  Kelsen grew up in Havre and Helena and has spent the last 15 years working to end domestic and sexual violence. She currently serves as the Executive Director for the Montana Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, which is a statewide non-profit.

Posted: January 26, 2012 at 5:14 pm

Congressman Rehberg: Clueless or Lying?

KXLH News is reporting this week on the issue of corruption and the need for accountability and transparency in Montana election laws. Tester supports it, Rehberg does not.

Here’s the video:

You can see that Rehberg either doesn’t understand the issue or is deliberately trying to mislead the public about what Citizens United is about.   Take a closer look at the Congressman’s statement for this report:

“I don’t think we should deny people their Constitutional right to free speech just because they’re part of a corporation instead of a different form of organization like a non-profit, a campaign or a union,”

Of course, this is not what Citizens United is about. Under the Citizens United decision, corporations can secretly spend unlimited money on political campaigns with no transparency or accountability—a decision Jon Tester opposes and is trying to overturn through a constitutional amendment. The speech and contributions of individual people is not at issue as Rehberg tries to claim.  To be sure, alcohol does kill brain cells.

Jon Tester meanwhile has always has been a clear champion of transparency and accountability.  In his recent opinion column, Tester said the Citizens United decision:

“undermines Montana’s values and America’s democracy by allowing big – even foreign – corporations to secretly buy American political elections.”