Tagged: GOP primary

Posted: February 28, 2012 at 7:45 pm

ANALYSIS: What’s Behind Rick Hill’s Burning Pants

Republican Rick Hill is trying to tell folks in Eastern Montana that he’s a “Montana native” – despite being born, raised and schooled out-of-state.  The deception was attempted at a Lincoln Day Dinner where Hill and the other GOP candidates spoke last week.  

There are two ways to explain Hill’s behavior here.  First, Hill could be lying because he thinks that’s the only way he stands a chance against Bullock.

Governor Schweitzer hit on this recently – pointing to one of the many reasons why Bullock is a stronger candidate  than the GOPers:

“They’re just going to have a real tough time beating Bullock.  Not only is he a great guy, he’s got a young and beautiful family . . . been a spectacular attorney general.  He’s born and bred in Montana.  A lot of these cats that are running right now, they’re born someplace else, they’re interlopers. They just show up, they say, ‘It’s a small state, maybe I can go be governor of it.’…Bullock has got deep roots, he’s a smart guy.  If you’ve got a $100 in your pocket, you ought to bet on Bullock.  Bullock’s going to win this race.”

The only other explanation is that dishonesty and deception is so deeply ingrained in Hill’s imbecilic nature that he just can’t help himself. After all, neither Jim Lynch nor Ken Miller lied about their out-of-state roots in the Sidney Herald article reporting on their appearance.  Nor is this the first time Rick Hill has been caught trying to hide the truth about his past.

He tried to scrub from his Wikipedia page the fact that he left his wife and young kids for a mermaid/cocktail waitress. When his family showed up to beg him to come home he laughed in their faces.  He described this behavior in an email to Republicans assingle parenthood.”  If Rick Hill will lie about his own background, no one should be surprised when he lies about jobs, schools and revenue.

Posted: February 14, 2012 at 7:37 am

Nutjobs Only Need Apply

The Montana Republican Party Executive Director, Bowen Greenwood, this week is calling out a fellow Republican legislative candidate for not being a nutjob and accusing him of being a dastardly RINO.

Greenwood made the unusual move of taking sides in a legislative primary the Koch brothers’ former State Director Scott Sales, attacking Sales’ primary opponent in the Bozeman area race. Remember that the Koch brothers gave Greenwood’s predecessor, Jake Eaton, a job after he was forced to leave the Montana GOP in disgrace over his involvement in a Republican voter suppression scheme.  Maybe Greenwood is just trying to keep is future options open.

What makes Sales a real Republican, besides his love of Koch, is first his unabashed ability to attribute fake quotes to Abraham Lincoln. This is important, because Lincoln is the one of the only decent Republicans out there.  He didn’t say a lot of nutjob nonsense. So, it must be fabricated so that people think the GOP has always been this way.

Anyway, on the first day of the session before last, Scott Sales (R-Bozeman), as the House  Minority Leader was looking to set a right winger tone to the session.  Sales read a series of quotes that he attributed to former President Abraham Lincoln. A newspaper reporter looked into those quotes and found that Lincoln never said them.  Sales was forced to apologize on the House Floor, saying he’d been “duped” because he got his information from the internets.

Sales also proved his real Republican-ness when he declared the session was going to be a “war”.  He appointed a nutjob, a Constitution Party member, head of the education committee.  And he’s been palling around with the Tea Party, ranting about how the Government should “live within its means, like the vast majority of families do” ever since.  Well, not his own family, apparently.

So at least the Montana Republican Party has finally put it out in the open: Nutjobs only need apply.

Posted: January 3, 2012 at 6:02 pm

Presidential Candidates Get A Favor from Rehberg

The Hill has a running list up of which members of Congress are endorsing which presidential candidate.  As of this posting, the tallies stood at Romney – 61, Perry-13, Gingrich-8, Paul-3, Cain-1 Bachman-1, Santorum-0.

Montana Congressman Rehberg is not on the list.

To be sure, Rehberg’s absence could simply be explained by his fear to make a choice this early. But given that we already heard his de facto endorsement of Bachmann in February of 2011, it may be that he was asked by the campaigns to do them a solid and stay out.  After all, Rehberg has been at the center of Congress’s failure and brinksmanship throughout the budget debate. As David Weigel theorizes in Slatethe brinkmanship and failure to accomplish anything is tanking the popularity of House Republicans:

there has been a rarely-admitted fatigue with the Republican House, and its inability to get anything done unless there’s last-minute stop-the-clock brinkmanship…it started to mean that you were part of Washington machinery that was creaking and belching acrid smoke.

Posted: December 20, 2011 at 8:42 pm

Livingstone Taking Gloves Off?

Word on the street from Kalispell is: at a recent Flathead Republican meeting, gubernatorial candidate Neil Livingstone took a few hard swings at his opponent Rick Hill.

Livingstone supposedly made reference to “values,” and said that Hill has proven in his past that he doesn’t have good ones; and he described Hill is a “failed businessman” who is not qualified to be Governor.

Livingstone knows about business, having made a fortune charging foreign governments (and dictators) for expertise on terrorism and international relations, whereas Rick Hill charged the state of Montana a fortune for inflated rental space.

But Livingstone might also have trouble with the GOP values police: not long ago, he split from his longtime spouse, trading her in for a newer model, a “young blond dish.” So values might not be his card.

Posted: April 4, 2011 at 8:05 am

Montana GOP Hopeful Might Have Mermaid Fetish

“Much like sirens, mermaids will sing to people or to gods to enchant them, distracting them from their work and causing people to walk off a ship’s deck or to run their ship aground” –Wikipedia article on mermaids.

Former Congressman and Gubernatorial hopeful Rick Hill’s candidacy for Governor has met an unusual obstacle, rarely seen in politics: a mermaid. And at least one conservative group is not pleased about it.

In an e-mail that seems to have made the rounds this weekend, Montana Conservative Families, one of a number of right-wing social groups in Montana that hold candidates accountable if they stray from conservative principles, has dredged up some sordid details of Hill’s adulterous past.

In local newsclippings dredged up by MCF, Hill admits that while married with young children, he was having an affair with a barmaid at a lounge in Great Falls. At this bar, waitresses take turns slipping into bikinis and mermaid tails and jumping into a tank behind the bar, swimming around and blowing kisses to the patrons.

A few commenters on this blog have previously hinted at Hill’s philandering, but a woman named Nancy Davis, apparently connected with MCF, has now posted dozens of stories from the late 1990s not only about Hill’s affair with the barmaid, but also his messy divorce and several wives. One of these articles reports that Hill’s first wife once put her three children in the car and drove to the Sip and Dip, where Hill was hanging out with the barmaid. They asked daddy to come home, but he told them to scram.

In Montana politics, adultery, in and of itself, is off-limits as a discussable issue, until the politician makes it an issue. And Hill did just that, with two unfortunate decisions that he probably now regrets:

1) When Hill was running for re-election in 2000 (before he suddenly dropped out of the race), he trashed his opponent, Nancy Keenan, for “lacking an understanding of family values” because “she has no children of her own.” It was later revealed that Keenan had had a hysterectomy after cancer as a young woman. Hill’s accusation was a calculated and typical Montana GOP veiled suggestion about lesbianism. It was as ugly as politics can get. There were hundreds of thousands of robo-calls all over the state, asking voters if they were “concerned about an unmarried and childless woman representing Montana in Congress.” In the 1990s, these GOP playbook-tactics worked like magic.

2) In his 1998 re-elect campaign, it was revealed that Hill’s new (second) wife was helping his campaign by secretly communicating with a third party group, on the production of an attack-ad against Hill’s opponent, Bill Yellowtail. This campaign ad accused Yellowtail of (you guessed it) lacking family values, based on the fact that he’d hit his wife many years earlier. (Zero sympathy here for Yellowtail). The FEC split 2-2 on whether to prosecute Hill for breaking federal law, which forbids coordination between a campaign and third-party groups.

Upon hearing Hill decry Yellowtail’s lack of family values, Hill’s first wife came public because she said she was tired of watching Hill attacking others for flaws that resembled his own. In a press conference, she not only recounted the Sip and Dip tale (or tail), she also alleged that Hill had been emotionally abusive as a husband, and had also dragged her through an awful 8-year custody battle.

Hill will have a bumpy ride from here on out. At least one conservative blog is already lowering the boom on him. And based on her Facebook page, the woman who is the source of the e-mail appears to have strong ties with conservatives, counting numerous right-wing social types, including a fair number of legislators, among her friends.

Also listed is Ken Miller, one of the six GOP primary candidates, a hard-core religious conservative from Laurel who, interestingly, appears as the only “follower” of the nasty articles that have been posted about Hill.

Hat/Tip Montanafesto and Intelligent Discontent.

Posted: March 10, 2011 at 12:12 pm

Big Yawn….

..at the Capitol yesterday, in response to a newly released document (available at Intelligent Discontent) that rates every legislator according to how conservative he or she is.

The document comes from Roger Koopman, the former legislator from Bozeman, who has, in the past, organized primary challenges against moderate Republican legislators who he believes are not conservative enough. Yesterday, Koopman figured he’d try to scare the moderate Rs in the legislature by giving them liberal ratings, and so guys like Jim Peterson, the Senate President, got dinged as a “liberal” on Koopman’s rating scale, according to Peterson’s votes on a number of bills that serve as a collective litmus test for Koopman’s crazy group, Conservative Alliance of Montana.

Of course, Koopman has been sort of quiet ever since it was revealed that he was using state government resources, illegally, to earn himself a tidy personal income. (At the time he got busted, he was ranting about the need for “less government”).

The added problem for Koopman and his group right now is that the Tea Party is acting like a bunch of loons and has become a state-wide joke, so I doubt anyone is taking a person seriously who is advocating for Republicans to be as far to the right as possible.  But if Koopman wants to put more Tea Partiers on the ballot and fewer moderate Republicans, amen. It would quickly reduce the Republicans’ majority.

Posted: February 14, 2011 at 5:12 pm

Ouch

When you’re getting incoming from the members of your own party, you know it’s bad.

This weekend, the AP reported that yet another Republican has entered the 2012 gubernatorial primary. In response to the announcement, retired congressman turned candidate for governor Rick Hill takes a swipe, however it wasn’t a swipe at his new opponent.

Here is the pointed comment from Rick Hill mouthpiece Chuck Denowh:

“No one can match Rick Hill’s record of delivering for Montana,” he said. “There really is a differentiation there. Livingstone has an impressive resume, but I don’t see he has a lot of applicable experience to be a governor.”

No one? Not even the current Congressman, 25 year career professional politician Dennis Rehberg?  I guess not.

Posted: November 9, 2010 at 6:44 am

Gov Candidates Personify Cracks in Unstable TEA Party Republican Alliance

The GOP 2012 gubernatorial hopefuls this week struggled to define themselves in the era of the unstable new TEA Party Republican alliance.

Former Congressman Rick Hill, stealing a line from Derek Skees, of all people, in a statement thick with irony because he, as a former member of Congress, is the epitome of the establishment candidate,  told reporters afterward that he has been described as

“being in the tea party before the tea party was cool.”

Right. The only thing he has going for him that is remotely TEA is his Palin-esque is his drop-out of the 2000 Congressional contest with Nancy Keenan.

Hill is not only the quintessential establishment candidate, but his political skills appear to have slipped, leaving further doubts about his ability to pull off a campaign in the modern era.  He announced his candidacy late on a Friday afternoon, guaranteeing his announcement will get the least possible circulation (the Saturday paper).

Stapleton also tried to go the establishment route (probably a wise move for him given that he is emerging as the goofball in the race) saying

“I don’t really think of myself as running for governor as anything other than the party I am,” he said. “I am a Republican.”

However, he seemed to have realized the mistake as soon is it was out of his mouth and was quick to hedge that with

“I love the energy the tea party brings, especially because it engages people that may not previously have been engaged.”

Miller, who first announced his candidacy in a misspelled Facebook post, tried to stake out the ground held by the tired old social conservative movement, problem is, that is the ground from which the current GOP is actively distancing themselves.

Of the three, Miller was most outspoken in his campaign announcement on social issues favored by Christian conservatives by making it clear he will oppose abortion by working to “protect life at all stages.”

So far, that leaves no candidate as the clear front-runner.