Tagged: Man Purse

Posted: October 21, 2010 at 6:24 pm

“Man Purse-gate” Becomes Statewide Story

Matt Gouras, Associated Press, has done a profile of Cowgirl, citing my blog as having an “uncanny knack” for getting the inside scoop! Sorry for you GOPers who don’t know how to set up a blog to receive tips or use Google.

Under discussion in his piece–in fact the reason he wrote the piece–is the “controversy” about the “Man v. Man Purse” dueling photos.  Gouras uses the article to ask rhetorically whether it “crossed the line” and said I was “under fire” from liberals (I guess one or two people qualifies as an entire movement for Gouras, but not to the rest of the world.)  As my fellow blogger and activist ally D. Gregory Smith who blogs at From Eternity to Here and Bilerico.com says:

Cowgirl has never presented herself as anything other than an ally in the struggle for LGBT Montanan’s rights. She’s entitled to a little tongue-in-cheek humor as far as I’m concerned.

But whatever, the fact is that Jamee Greer is an amazing organizer. I’ve  praised his work in the past and appreciated the kind words and information he’s provided to this blog time and again.  I am sincerely sorry to offend him, and have greatly appreciated all the comments on my post on Roy Brown.

Given what Tea Party candidates around the state are doing and saying (in Whitefish they are hanging around with Militia members and Nazi apologists; in Bozeman they are calling gays beastialists, in Helena they are distorting the truth about health and tolerance, in Red Lodge they are making vulgar slurs, and the GOP platform calls for imprisoning gay citizens), I’m planning to continue to fight hate from here on out.

Actually, the most salient part of Man-Purse-gate is what happened a week after the photos were posted: a TV commercial aired, revealing that Roy Brown never hunted in Montana until he ran for Governor and went out and bought a hunting license to help his political career, posing for an idiotic photo with a bunch of dead geese, a la John Kerry in 2004.  (See below.)  So it potentially takes on more relevance now, and perhaps vindicates the original purpose in my talking about a man purse, which was that Roy is an urban landlord, not a rugged outdoorsman. Sexual orientation had nothing to do with it.

And as for the likelihood that Roy and his geese get the same front-page coverage as Kerry’s geese (Kerry’s goosegate was front page material in the days before the 2004 election), my guess is that the Gazette will not cover Roy’s goosegate at all, simply because this time it’s a  Republican, not a Democrat, who is eating goose.

John Kerry treats the second amendment as a photo op.Roy Brown treats the second amendment as a photo op.

Posted: October 17, 2010 at 9:31 am

Metro

Much ado about a man purse this weekend. At least we now know that it is a sensitive subject, and that numerous metro-sexuals  believe in standing up for the MP. Fair enough. I will not touch that subject again (at least not for a while).

But, at the same time, we need remember that when Roy Brown complains about “negative campaigning”, it was Roy who tried drawing first blood in 2008 with a series of nasty ads, talking about how Schweitzer was a “bully,” and that Schweitzer had somehow strong-armed or otherwise “bullied” various legislators and state officials into getting what he wanted (a balanced budget with a $300 million surplus).  Leaving aside for a moment the interesting additional proof this provides that Roy is the sensitive type, how can Roy be claiming with a straight face that he hates negative campaigning? And this year, as in 2008, Roy threw the first shoe as well, talking about “Tax Hike Van Dyk” (with no evidence to support it) long before election season.

So cry me a river. If Roy is going to shoot his toy gun, he can’t complain when someone fires a rifle at him.